Commitments And Contingencies
|12 Months Ended|
Dec. 31, 2018
|Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]|
|Commitments and Contingencies||
NOTE 13 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Effective January 1, 2016, the Company entered into employment contracts with Donald Steinberg (Chief Executive Officer), Charles Larsen (Director), respectively. Effective September 1, 2018, engaged Jesus Quintero (Chief Financial Officer) for annual compensation of $36,000. The contracts are for a one year term with automatic renewal. For each fiscal year, the officers are eligible to receive an annual bonus based on the sole and absolute discretion of the board of directors. In addition, during the employment term, the officers are eligible to participate in the Marijuana Company of America, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan, as determined by the board of board of directors and any fringe benefits and perquisites consistent with the practices of the Company and to the extent the Company provides similar benefits or perquisites (or both) to similarly situated executives of the Company during employment term.
The employment contracts can be terminated by either the Company or the officer at any time for any reason with at least a 30-day notice. Should termination occur by the Company without cause and subject to certain limitations (as defined); the officer is entitled to one year base pay and target bonus for the year in which termination occurs, as a lump sum payment 30 days following termination. In addition, subject to the Marijuana Company of America, Inc. Equity Incentive Plan or any successor Plan, all previously granted and outstanding equity based compensation awards shall become fully vested and exercisable for their remaining terms (subject to limitations).
On June 16, 2017, the Company entered into a lease agreement, whereby the Company leased for office space in Escondido, California, commencing July 1, 2017 and expiring on June 30, 2019 at a base monthly lease rate of $1,974 per month.
Future minimum lease payments under these three agreements are as follows:
The Company is subject at times to other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of its business. Although occasional adverse decisions or settlements may occur, the Company believes that the final disposition of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
On June 25, 2018, DTTO Funding filed a complaint against the Company for breach of contract related to the Company’s April 20, 2017 convertible promissory note in which DTTO lent the Company $111,111. Principal and interest in the note were, at the election of DTTO, convertible into common shares of the Company. On November 30, 2017, DTTO notified the Company of an election to convert a portion of the note to common shares, but the Company failed to process the conversion. The Company failed to repay principal and interest otherwise due on the maturity date of April 20, 2018. DTTO’s action sought damages against the Company including principal, default interest, liquidated damages, attorney fees and costs in an amount with an alleged present cash value of $1,787,981.10.
The Company filed an answer to the complaint. Thereafter, the Company entered into settlement negotiations with DTTO. In its review of the complaint, the Company determined (i) it had no money to pay damages under the note including principal, interest, liquidated damages, penalties and costs; (ii) it could not fund its litigation related expenses in Texas; (iii) it may be exposed to potential additional attorney fees and costs in the event the Company loses the litigated case; (iv) there was a benefit to obtaining a quick resolution of the litigated case; and, (v) litigating the case would require a significant commitment of personal time and costs for the Company’s affiliates, directors and officers, taking them away from the business of the Company. The Company’s negotiations led to a proposed stipulation for settlement, a court order and joint motion for entry of judgment based on the negotiated settlement. The Company reviewed the terms and determined the total number of shares issuable under the proposed stipulation were reasonable in light of the above noted reasons. the Company, in an exercise of prudent business judgment, determined that entry into the stipulated judgment was reasonable and in the best interests of the shareholders, because settlement would terminate the litigation, allowing the Company to avoid accrual of additional damages under the note recoverable by Plaintiff including interest, liquidated damages, penalties and costs; and, entry into the proposed Stipulation will also end the Company’s obligations to pay for its own legal counsel fees and related litigation fees, which it could afford. On September 4, 2018, after noticed motion, Judge Sam A. Lindsay granted the joint motion and adopted the stipulation to settle the case as the order of the Court. As a result, pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) and the Court’s order, the Company issued 57,676,810 common stock shares in settlement of the litigation with prejudice for at a total value of $1,701,466 and thus eliminating the contingent liability.
The entire disclosure for commitments and contingencies.
Reference 1: http://fasb.org/us-gaap/role/ref/legacyRef